It’s easy and often justified to be critical of aid and development. I do it. Others do it. But sometimes it helps to remind ourselves that it can work well. Take this example, of a market generation project to set up a mosquito net industry in seven countries (via Alanna Shaikh).
“In a decade-long initiative to protect millions of families from malaria in sub-Saharan Africa, a U.S. government-funded project helped sell 50 million bed nets in seven countries, crafted a voucher system to allow the poor to receive them for free or partial cost, and created enough incentives for private companies that they invested $88 million to expand their businesses…This new commercial approach also helped reduce the price of insecticide-treated mosquito nets by 30 to 70 percent. Now, those nets sell for between US$4 and US$7.
The NetMark project, a $67 million, USAID-funded public-private partnership to prevent malaria, ends September 30, but the bed net market continues to thrive in seven countries where it operated—Nigeria, Senegal, Mali, Ghana, Uganda, Ethiopia, and Zambia. Not only did the U.S. investment help spur major spending by private companies—for every $1 in public funds, African and international businesses spent $1.30—the new commercial sector now exists… “There are now 41 African distributors who will continue to sell thousands or millions of nets in those seven countries. The voucher system is now entrenched.”
Jeffrey L. Sturchio, President and CEO of the Global Health Council, praised the initiative for creating a model that will last. “This project shows the surprising results that come from combining creativity, commitment, and commercial innovation on global health issues,” he said. “It also shows that novel partnerships, bringing the public and private sectors together, can achieve impressive improvements in public health in a way that is reliable and sustainable.”
But the best quote?
“We worked ourselves out of a job. They don’t need us anymore, and I’m proud of that”
- Juan Manuel Urrutia, AED’s Johannesburg-based deputy director of NetMark.
I love it.
It shouldn’t be a surprise to any readers that I am excited about a market-based development solution. But even as successful examples like this emerge, funders still seem uncomfortable with the variability of such a project. Funding applicants are saying: instead of providing exactly X bednets by direct distribution, we’re going to try to set conditions in place where others might sell far more than X bednets. There’s no guarantee, but the potential is there for a massive, sustainable upside, as was the case here. The added bonus is that the project won’t cannibalize existing businesses (as much) by flooding the area with free goods. This is the proposition organizations like IDE, EWV, Practica and Kickstart make with every pitch.
The particulars don’t concern me as much as the fact that the approach worked in harmony with existing markets and allowed people to make their own choices about what solutions work for them. This can be powerful.
B
(shot from Ethiopia, 2009. See how I got it here.)
Check out more: Featured Posts - Africa - Ethiopia - Senegal - Marketing - Development - Economy
(shot of neighbours in Ethiopia. Story here.)





{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Good to know things like this exist, but such a shame that only 7 out of all the African countries affected by malaria get this. In Burkina Faso mosquito nets are really expensive, more than 10 dollars for the cheapest ones (for a while there were these UNDP sponsored ones on sale in the pharmacies, for 2, 50 and they were really good, but they sold out- some local ‘re-salers’ (revendeurs) bought them and sold them for more on the street to people who didn’t know better. Complicated stuff.
But also, the price is not the only thing preventing people from using mozzie nets, at least in Burkina, it is more complex. Heat is a factor, often people who have money prefer to spray the rooms with deadly insecticide and put on fans (which in theory chases the mozzies away). Sorry, I am bogarting your comment area, but I always get carried away on these simple but complex issues.
I love they link to the bread story, fabulous photos.
[Reply]
Brendan Reply:
October 27th, 2009 at 1:32 pm
Great comments.
1) I agree completely that the proposition is more complex than the net, or the economics surrounding that net. This is a question of marketing to potential users and setting up a system that can deliver them appropriately, given economic and social considerations. A step in the right direction.
2) Projects structured in ways like htis are not the norm. So it often takes smaller pilot projects to prove the concept, before broader acceptance can occur. Even then, there are few development type projects that blanket Africa - most search for the lowest hanging fruit. I agree with this approach.
B
[Reply]